The Centre had introduced the PLI scheme to encourage domestic production of specialty steel and lower imports by drawing in capital investments. Union Minister of Steel and Heavy Industries H.D. Kumaraswamy had launched the ‘PLI scheme 1.1’ on Monday (January 6, 2024), the statement said .
The Centre had earlier introduced the PLI scheme to encourage domestic production of specialty steel and lower imports by drawing in capital investments. Initially launched for three sectors to address the need to boost domestic manufacturing during COVID-19 lockdown, the PLI scheme was later extended to include steel in November 2020.
The scheme has attracted investments worth ₹27,106 crore, envisaging creation of 14,760 direct employment opportunities with an estimated production of 7.90 million tonnes of specialty steel. As of November 2024, companies have already invested ₹18,300 crore and generated over 8,660 employment opportunities.
The Union government has been interacting regularly with the participating companies and based on feedback, it was felt that there was a scope to notify the scheme again to attract more participation, the Ministry statement said.
What is the Production Linked Incentive Scheme (PLI)?
The PLI scheme was conceived to scale up domestic manufacturing capability, accompanied by higher import substitution and employment generation launched in March 2020, the scheme initially targeted three industries:
- Mobile and allied Component Manufacturing
- Electrical Component Manufacturing and
- Medical Devices
Later, it was extended to 14 sectors. In the PLI scheme, Domestic and Foreign companies receive financial rewards for manufacturing in India, based on a percentage of their revenue over up to five years.
Targeted Sectors: The 14 sectors are mobile manufacturing, manufacturing of medical devices, automobiles and auto components, pharmaceuticals, drugs, specialty steel, telecom & networking products, electronic products, white goods (ACs and LEDs), food products, textile products, solar PV modules, advanced chemistry cell (ACC) battery, and drones and drone components.
Incentives Under the Scheme:The incentives given, are calculated on the basis of incremental sales. In some sectors such as advanced chemistry cell batteries, textile products and the drone industry, the incentive to be given will be calculated on the basis of sales, performance and local value addition done over the period of five years. The emphasis on R&D investment will also help the industry keep up with global trends and remain competitive in the international market.
Success in Smartphone Manufacturing:In FY 2017-18, mobile phone imports were USD 3.6 billion, while exports were a mere USD 334 million, resulting in a -USD 3.3 billion trade deficit. By FY 2022-23, imports reduced to USD 1.6 billion, while exports surged to nearly USD 11 billion, yielding a positive net exports of USD 9.8 billion.
What are the Issues with the PLI Scheme?
Assembly vs. Value Addition:The subsidy in the scheme for Mobile and allied Component Manufacturing is paid only for finishing the phone in India, not on how much value is added by manufacturing in India, turning out that very little apart from assembly is done in India.
So India still imports much of what goes into the mobile phones. The imports of mobile phone components — including display screens, cameras, batteries, printed circuit boards — shot up between FY21 and FY23. Incidentally, these are the same two years when mobile phone exports jumped the most.
WTO Constraints and Limited Value Addition:WTO rules prevent India from tying PLI subsidies to domestic value addition. Although India’s aspiration to make chips is sound, chips are complex components. The absence of significant domestic value addition likely stems from these constraints.
Vague Disbursal of Incentives:While an Empowered Committee has been standardizedersee the scheme and handle fund disbursement for different sectors, the process of awarding incentives lacks clarity.
There are no well-defined criteria or standardized parameters that ministries and departments use to determine the allocation of these incentives, raising concerns about the fairness and effectiveness of the scheme.
Lack of a Centralized Database:The lack of a centralized database that captures information like increase in production or exports, number of new jobs created etc. make the evaluation process an administrative complexities. This information ambiguity impacts transparency and can lead to malfeasance, further widening the fault lines and weakening the policy structure.
Way Forward
The Government must assess PLI’s effectiveness, considering job creation, cost per job, and reasons for limited success. Extending the scheme to new sectors requires understanding its limitations and addressing underlying issues.
